6.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Weißschuh thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de
commit 2362e8124ed21445c6886806e5deaee717629ddd upstream.
In the past %pK was preferable to %p as it would not leak raw pointer values into the kernel log.
Since commit ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p") the regular %p has been improved to avoid this issue.
Furthermore, restricted pointers ("%pK") were never meant to be used through printk(). They can still unintentionally leak raw pointers or acquire sleeping locks in atomic contexts.
Switch to the regular pointer formatting which is safer and easier to reason about.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen chenhuacai@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_orc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_orc.c +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/unwind_orc.c @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_sta
state->pc = bt_address(pc); if (!state->pc) { - pr_err("cannot find unwind pc at %pK\n", (void *)pc); + pr_err("cannot find unwind pc at %p\n", (void *)pc); goto err; }