On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 11:17 AM Matthew Wilcox willy@infradead.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:01:35AM +1200, Barry Song wrote:
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int nfs_swap_rw(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter) { ssize_t ret;
VM_BUG_ON(iov_iter_count(iter) != PAGE_SIZE);
VM_WARN_ON(iov_iter_count(iter) != iov_iter_npages(iter, INT_MAX) * PAGE_SIZE);
Why not just delete the assertion like Christoph did?
I'm fine with either option. While maintaining this, my thought at the time was that I might want to reassess this assertion once mTHP swapout is supported on swapfiles later.