6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com
commit 0a567c2a10033bf04ed618368d179bce6977984b upstream.
Since its introduction, the mentioned MIB accounted for the wrong event: wake-up being skipped as not-needed on some edge condition instead of incoming skb being dropped after landing in the (subflow) receive queue.
Move the increment in the correct location.
Fixes: ce599c516386 ("mptcp: properly account bulk freed memory") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau martineau@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -363,8 +363,10 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skb(struct mptc skb_orphan(skb);
/* try to fetch required memory from subflow */ - if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) + if (!mptcp_rmem_schedule(sk, ssk, skb->truesize)) { + MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); goto drop; + }
has_rxtstamp = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->has_rxtstamp;
@@ -851,10 +853,8 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, s sk_rbuf = ssk_rbuf;
/* over limit? can't append more skbs to msk, Also, no need to wake-up*/ - if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) { - MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED); + if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) return; - }
/* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */ mptcp_data_lock(sk);