From: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de
[ Upstream commit b494f9c566ba5fe2cc8abe67fdeb0332c6b48d4b ]
These two functions are rather larger and not in a fast path, so move them out of line.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Acked-by: Tejun Heo tj@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230203150400.3199230-13-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Stable-dep-of: f814bdda774c ("blk-wbt: Fix detection of dirty-throttled tasks") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- block/blk-rq-qos.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ block/blk-rq-qos.h | 61 ++-------------------------------------------- 2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c index 88f0fe7dcf545..aae98dcb01ebe 100644 --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c @@ -294,3 +294,63 @@ void rq_qos_exit(struct request_queue *q) rqos->ops->exit(rqos); } } + +int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos) +{ + /* + * No IO can be in-flight when adding rqos, so freeze queue, which + * is fine since we only support rq_qos for blk-mq queue. + * + * Reuse ->queue_lock for protecting against other concurrent + * rq_qos adding/deleting + */ + blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); + + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + if (rq_qos_id(q, rqos->id)) + goto ebusy; + rqos->next = q->rq_qos; + q->rq_qos = rqos; + spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); + + if (rqos->ops->debugfs_attrs) { + mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); + blk_mq_debugfs_register_rqos(rqos); + mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex); + } + + return 0; +ebusy: + spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); + return -EBUSY; + +} + +void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos) +{ + struct rq_qos **cur; + + /* + * See comment in rq_qos_add() about freezing queue & using + * ->queue_lock. + */ + blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); + + spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + for (cur = &q->rq_qos; *cur; cur = &(*cur)->next) { + if (*cur == rqos) { + *cur = rqos->next; + break; + } + } + spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); + + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); + + mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); + blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_rqos(rqos); + mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex); +} diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.h b/block/blk-rq-qos.h index 1ef1f7d4bc3cb..805eee8b031d0 100644 --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.h +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.h @@ -85,65 +85,8 @@ static inline void rq_wait_init(struct rq_wait *rq_wait) init_waitqueue_head(&rq_wait->wait); }
-static inline int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos) -{ - /* - * No IO can be in-flight when adding rqos, so freeze queue, which - * is fine since we only support rq_qos for blk-mq queue. - * - * Reuse ->queue_lock for protecting against other concurrent - * rq_qos adding/deleting - */ - blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); - - spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - if (rq_qos_id(q, rqos->id)) - goto ebusy; - rqos->next = q->rq_qos; - q->rq_qos = rqos; - spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - - blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); - - if (rqos->ops->debugfs_attrs) { - mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); - blk_mq_debugfs_register_rqos(rqos); - mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex); - } - - return 0; -ebusy: - spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); - return -EBUSY; - -} - -static inline void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos) -{ - struct rq_qos **cur; - - /* - * See comment in rq_qos_add() about freezing queue & using - * ->queue_lock. - */ - blk_mq_freeze_queue(q); - - spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - for (cur = &q->rq_qos; *cur; cur = &(*cur)->next) { - if (*cur == rqos) { - *cur = rqos->next; - break; - } - } - spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock); - - blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q); - - mutex_lock(&q->debugfs_mutex); - blk_mq_debugfs_unregister_rqos(rqos); - mutex_unlock(&q->debugfs_mutex); -} +int rq_qos_add(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos); +void rq_qos_del(struct request_queue *q, struct rq_qos *rqos);
typedef bool (acquire_inflight_cb_t)(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data); typedef void (cleanup_cb_t)(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data);