5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kalesh AP kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com
[ Upstream commit 98647df0178df215b8239c5c365537283b2852a6 ]
When the HWRM command fails, driver currently returns -EFAULT(Bad address). This does not look correct.
Modified to return -EIO(I/O error).
Fixes: cc1ec769b87c ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Fixing the Control path command and response handling") Fixes: 65288a22ddd8 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: use shadow qd while posting non blocking rcfw command") Link: https://patch.msgid.link/r/1728373302-19530-5-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@b... Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier selvin.xavier@broadcom.com Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe jgg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c index 5cdfa84faf85e..e74fb7c4d0335 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ int bnxt_qplib_rcfw_send_message(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, /* failed with status */ dev_err(&rcfw->pdev->dev, "cmdq[%#x]=%#x status %#x\n", cookie, opcode, evnt->status); - rc = -EFAULT; + rc = -EIO; }
return rc;