5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ricardo B. Marlière rbm@suse.com
[ Upstream commit 98857d111c53954aa038fcbc4cf48873e4240f7c ]
Commit e9fc3ce99b34 ("libbpf: Streamline error reporting for high-level APIs") redefined the way that bpf_prog_detach2() returns. Therefore, adapt the usage in test_lirc_mode2_user.c.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière rbm@suse.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko andrii@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250828-selftests-bpf-v1-1-c7811cd8b98c@suse.co... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c index fb5fd6841ef39..d63878bc2d5f9 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
/* Let's try detach it before it was ever attached */ ret = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, lircfd, BPF_LIRC_MODE2); - if (ret != -1 || errno != ENOENT) { + if (ret != -ENOENT) { printf("bpf_prog_detach2 not attached should fail: %m\n"); return 1; }