6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ido Schimmel idosch@nvidia.com
commit 2033ab90380d46e0e9f0520fd6776a73d107fd95 upstream.
Cited commit converted the neighbour code to use the standard RCU variant instead of the RCU-bh variant, but the VRF code still uses rcu_read_lock_bh() / rcu_read_unlock_bh() around the neighbour lookup code in its IPv4 and IPv6 output paths, resulting in lockdep splats [1][2]. Can be reproduced using [3].
Fix by switching to rcu_read_lock() / rcu_read_unlock().
[1] ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.5.0-rc1-custom-g9c099e6dbf98 #403 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/neighbour.h:302 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by ping/183: #0: ffff888105ea1d80 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: raw_sendmsg+0xc6c/0x33c0 #1: ffffffff85b46820 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: vrf_output+0x2e3/0x2030
stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 183 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-custom-g9c099e6dbf98 #403 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc1/0xf0 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x211/0x3b0 vrf_output+0x1380/0x2030 ip_push_pending_frames+0x125/0x2a0 raw_sendmsg+0x200d/0x33c0 inet_sendmsg+0xa2/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x2aa/0x420 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe5/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[2] ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.5.0-rc1-custom-g9c099e6dbf98 #403 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/neighbour.h:302 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by ping6/182: #0: ffff888114b63000 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: rawv6_sendmsg+0x1602/0x3e50 #1: ffffffff85b46820 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: vrf_output6+0xe9/0x1310
stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 182 Comm: ping6 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc1-custom-g9c099e6dbf98 #403 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-1.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0xc1/0xf0 lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x211/0x3b0 vrf_output6+0xd32/0x1310 ip6_local_out+0xb4/0x1a0 ip6_send_skb+0xbc/0x340 ip6_push_pending_frames+0xe5/0x110 rawv6_sendmsg+0x2e6e/0x3e50 inet_sendmsg+0xa2/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x2aa/0x420 __x64_sys_sendto+0xe5/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[3] #!/bin/bash
ip link add name vrf-red up numtxqueues 2 type vrf table 10 ip link add name swp1 up master vrf-red type dummy ip address add 192.0.2.1/24 dev swp1 ip address add 2001:db8:1::1/64 dev swp1 ip neigh add 192.0.2.2 lladdr 00:11:22:33:44:55 nud perm dev swp1 ip neigh add 2001:db8:1::2 lladdr 00:11:22:33:44:55 nud perm dev swp1 ip vrf exec vrf-red ping 192.0.2.2 -c 1 &> /dev/null ip vrf exec vrf-red ping6 2001:db8:1::2 -c 1 &> /dev/null
Fixes: 09eed1192cec ("neighbour: switch to standard rcu, instead of rcu_bh") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju naresh.kamboju@linaro.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CA+G9fYtEr-=GbcXNDYo3XOkwR+uYgehVoDjsP0pFLUpZ... Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel idosch@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: David Ahern dsahern@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet edumazet@google.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230715153605.4068066-1-idosch@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/vrf.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c @@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ static int vrf_finish_output6(struct net skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IPV6); skb->dev = dev;
- rcu_read_lock_bh(); + rcu_read_lock(); nexthop = rt6_nexthop((struct rt6_info *)dst, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr); neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(dst->dev, nexthop); if (unlikely(!neigh)) @@ -672,10 +672,10 @@ static int vrf_finish_output6(struct net if (!IS_ERR(neigh)) { sock_confirm_neigh(skb, neigh); ret = neigh_output(neigh, skb, false); - rcu_read_unlock_bh(); + rcu_read_unlock(); return ret; } - rcu_read_unlock_bh(); + rcu_read_unlock();
IP6_INC_STATS(dev_net(dst->dev), ip6_dst_idev(dst), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES); @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static int vrf_finish_output(struct net } }
- rcu_read_lock_bh(); + rcu_read_lock();
neigh = ip_neigh_for_gw(rt, skb, &is_v6gw); if (!IS_ERR(neigh)) { @@ -898,11 +898,11 @@ static int vrf_finish_output(struct net sock_confirm_neigh(skb, neigh); /* if crossing protocols, can not use the cached header */ ret = neigh_output(neigh, skb, is_v6gw); - rcu_read_unlock_bh(); + rcu_read_unlock(); return ret; }
- rcu_read_unlock_bh(); + rcu_read_unlock(); vrf_tx_error(skb->dev, skb); return -EINVAL; }