Hello Rafael,
The tests fcntl35 and fcntl35_64 should have go from FAIL to PASS. https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg239475.html
Looking at https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-... I see that these two tests (and other important tests as well) are being SKIPPED.
By the way, I see that select04 FAILS in your case. But in my setup, select04 was working fine (x86_64) in 4.4.132. I will confirm that it still works in 4.4.133
Thanks, Daniel Sangorrin
-----Original Message----- From: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:stable-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael Tinoco Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 5:32 AM To: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; shuah@kernel.org; patches@kernelci.org; lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org; ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk; stable@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; torvalds@linux-foundation.org; linux@roeck-us.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/92] 4.4.133-stable review
kernel: 4.4.133-rc1 git repo:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y git commit: 915a3d7cdea9daa9e9fb6b855f10c1312e6910c4 git describe: v4.4.132-93-g915a3d7cdea9 Test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.132-93-... 3d7cdea9
No regressions (compared to build v4.4.132-71-g180635995c36)
It should have gotten better, as there was a fix in here for at least 2 LTP tests that we previously were not passing. I don't know why you all were not reporting that in the past, it took someone else randomly deciding to run LTP to report it to me...
Why did an improvement in results not show up?
Are you referring to the CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW fix for the arm64 vDSO ? I think that CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in VDSO wasn't backported to 4.4.y (commit 49eea433b326 in mainline) so this "fix" is changing the timekeeping sauce (that would fix MONOTONIC RAW) but not for 4.4.y in ARM64. Needs review though :\