[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]
Hi,
✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected. No action required from the submitter.
The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 930b64ca0c511521f0abdd1d57ce52b2a6e3476b
WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit: Backport author: cel@kernel.org Commit author: Jeff Laytonjlayton@kernel.org
Status in newer kernel trees: 6.14.y | Present (different SHA1: 9d9456185fd5) 6.13.y | Not found
Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit: --- 1: 930b64ca0c511 ! 1: 7d53ffdf10e3f nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register() @@ Metadata ## Commit message ## nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register()
+ [ Upstream commit 930b64ca0c511521f0abdd1d57ce52b2a6e3476b ] + Currently, nfsd_proc_stat_init() ignores the return value of svc_proc_register(). If the procfile creation fails, then the kernel will WARN when it tries to remove the entry later. @@ fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c: static __net_init int nfsd_net_init(struct net *net) seqlock_init(&nn->writeverf_lock); - nfsd_proc_stat_init(net); #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NFS_LOCALIO) - spin_lock_init(&nn->local_clients_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->local_clients); #endif return 0; ---
Results of testing on various branches:
| Branch | Patch Apply | Build Test | |---------------------------|-------------|------------| | stable/linux-6.12.y | Success | Success |