From: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 7ecbe92696bb7fe32c80b6cf64736a0d157717a9 ]
ksmbd seems to be trying to use a cmd value of 0 when unlocking a file. That activity requires a type of F_UNLCK with a cmd of F_SETLK. For local POSIX locking, it doesn't matter much since vfs_lock_file ignores @cmd, but filesystems that define their own ->lock operation expect to see it set sanely.
Cc: David Howells dhowells@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton jlayton@kernel.org Reviewed-by: David Howells dhowells@redhat.com Acked-by: Namjae Jeon linkinjeon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com --- fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c index a40c737ae280..08d416beb88e 100644 --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c @@ -6803,7 +6803,7 @@ static int smb2_set_flock_flags(struct file_lock *flock, int flags) case SMB2_LOCKFLAG_UNLOCK: ksmbd_debug(SMB, "received unlock request\n"); flock->fl_type = F_UNLCK; - cmd = 0; + cmd = F_SETLK; break; }
@@ -7181,7 +7181,7 @@ int smb2_lock(struct ksmbd_work *work) rlock->fl_start = smb_lock->start; rlock->fl_end = smb_lock->end;
- rc = vfs_lock_file(filp, 0, rlock, NULL); + rc = vfs_lock_file(filp, F_SETLK, rlock, NULL); if (rc) pr_err("rollback unlock fail : %d\n", rc);