On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:36:11 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
This commit has no direct upstream equivalent.
After commit d48016d74836 ("mm,ima,kexec,of: use memblock_free_late from ima_free_kexec_buffer") in 5.15, there is a modpost warning for certain configurations:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb14064): Section mismatch in reference from the function ima_free_kexec_buffer() to the function .init.text:__memblock_free_late() The function ima_free_kexec_buffer() references the function __init __memblock_free_late(). This is often because ima_free_kexec_buffer lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of __memblock_free_late is wrong.
In mainline, there is no issue because ima_free_kexec_buffer() is marked as __init, which was done as part of commit b69a2afd5afc ("x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec") in 6.0, which is not suitable for stable.
Mark ima_free_kexec_buffer() and its single caller ima_load_kexec_buffer() as __init in 5.15, as ima_load_kexec_buffer() is only called from ima_init(), which is __init, clearing up the warning.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor nathan@kernel.org
drivers/of/kexec.c | 2 +- include/linux/of.h | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
Now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h