6.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jordan Rife jrife@google.com
commit 86a7e0b69bd5b812e48a20c66c2161744f3caa16 upstream.
Callers of sock_sendmsg(), and similarly kernel_sendmsg(), in kernel space may observe their value of msg_name change in cases where BPF sendmsg hooks rewrite the send address. This has been confirmed to break NFS mounts running in UDP mode and has the potential to break other systems.
This patch:
1) Creates a new function called __sock_sendmsg() with same logic as the old sock_sendmsg() function. 2) Replaces calls to sock_sendmsg() made by __sys_sendto() and __sys_sendmsg() with __sock_sendmsg() to avoid an unnecessary copy, as these system calls are already protected. 3) Modifies sock_sendmsg() so that it makes a copy of msg_name if present before passing it down the stack to insulate callers from changes to the send address.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230912013332.2048422-1-jrife@google.com/ Fixes: 1cedee13d25a ("bpf: Hooks for sys_sendmsg") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Willem de Bruijn willemb@google.com Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife jrife@google.com Reviewed-by: Simon Horman horms@kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/socket.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c @@ -720,6 +720,14 @@ static inline int sock_sendmsg_nosec(str return ret; }
+static int __sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg) +{ + int err = security_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg, + msg_data_left(msg)); + + return err ?: sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg); +} + /** * sock_sendmsg - send a message through @sock * @sock: socket @@ -730,10 +738,19 @@ static inline int sock_sendmsg_nosec(str */ int sock_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg) { - int err = security_socket_sendmsg(sock, msg, - msg_data_left(msg)); + struct sockaddr_storage *save_addr = (struct sockaddr_storage *)msg->msg_name; + struct sockaddr_storage address; + int ret;
- return err ?: sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg); + if (msg->msg_name) { + memcpy(&address, msg->msg_name, msg->msg_namelen); + msg->msg_name = &address; + } + + ret = __sock_sendmsg(sock, msg); + msg->msg_name = save_addr; + + return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_sendmsg);
@@ -1110,7 +1127,7 @@ static ssize_t sock_write_iter(struct ki if (sock->type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) msg.msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
- res = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg); + res = __sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg); *from = msg.msg_iter; return res; } @@ -2114,7 +2131,7 @@ int __sys_sendto(int fd, void __user *bu if (sock->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) flags |= MSG_DONTWAIT; msg.msg_flags = flags; - err = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg); + err = __sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
out_put: fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed); @@ -2479,7 +2496,7 @@ static int ____sys_sendmsg(struct socket err = sock_sendmsg_nosec(sock, msg_sys); goto out_freectl; } - err = sock_sendmsg(sock, msg_sys); + err = __sock_sendmsg(sock, msg_sys); /* * If this is sendmmsg() and sending to current destination address was * successful, remember it.