Hi,
ansuelsmth@gmail.com wrote on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:34:16 +0100:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 11:32:56AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
Hi Christian,
ansuelsmth@gmail.com wrote on Thu, 21 Mar 2024 10:55:13 +0100:
MTD OTP logic is very fragile and can be problematic with some specific kind of devices.
NVMEM across the years had various iteration on how Cells could be declared in DT and MTD OTP probably was left behind and add_legacy_fixed_of_cells was enabled without thinking of the consequences.
That option enables NVMEM to scan the provided of_node and treat each child as a NVMEM Cell, this was to support legacy NVMEM implementation and don't cause regression.
This is problematic if we have devices like Nand where the OTP is triggered by setting a special mode in the flash. In this context real partitions declared in the Nand node are registered as OTP Cells and this cause probe fail with -EINVAL error.
This was never notice due to the fact that till now, no Nand supported the OTP feature. With commit e87161321a40 ("mtd: rawnand: macronix: OTP access for MX30LFxG18AC") this changed and coincidentally this Nand is used on an FritzBox 7530 supported on OpenWrt.
Alternative and more robust way to declare OTP Cells are already prossible by using the fixed-layout node or by declaring a child node with the compatible set to "otp-user" or "otp-factory".
To fix this and limit any regression with other MTD that makes use of declaring OTP as direct child of the dev node, disable add_legacy_fixed_of_cells if we have a node called nand since it's the standard property name to identify Nand devices attached to a Nand Controller.
You forgot to update the commit log :-)
Ugh... sorry. Ok to resend or I need to wait 24h similar to the rules on net-next?
You can go ahead, but I'll only queue it after -rc1 is out.
Thanks, Miquèl