4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hannu Lounento hannu.lounento@ge.com
[ Upstream commit 76ed5a8f47476e4984cc8c0c1bc4cee62650f7fd ]
Fix an if statement with hw_dbg lines where the logic was inverted with regards to the corresponding return value used in the if statement.
Signed-off-by: Hannu Lounento hannu.lounento@ge.com Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin peter.senna@collabora.com Tested-by: Aaron Brown aaron.f.brown@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c @@ -699,9 +699,9 @@ static s32 igb_update_flash_i210(struct
ret_val = igb_pool_flash_update_done_i210(hw); if (ret_val) - hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n"); - else hw_dbg("Flash update time out\n"); + else + hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n");
out: return ret_val;