5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jean Sacren sakiwit@gmail.com
commit 59060a47ca50bbdb1d863b73667a1065873ecc06 upstream.
entry->addr.id is u8 with a range from 0 to 255 and MAX_ADDR_ID is 255. We should drop both false expressions of (entry->addr.id > MAX_ADDR_ID).
We should also remove the obsolete parentheses in the first if branch.
Use U8_MAX for MAX_ADDR_ID and add a comment to show the link to mptcp_addr_info.id as suggested by Mr. Matthieu Baerts.
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts matthieu.baerts@tessares.net Signed-off-by: Jean Sacren sakiwit@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct mptcp_pm_add_entry { u8 retrans_times; };
-#define MAX_ADDR_ID 255 +/* max value of mptcp_addr_info.id */ +#define MAX_ADDR_ID U8_MAX #define BITMAP_SZ DIV_ROUND_UP(MAX_ADDR_ID + 1, BITS_PER_LONG)
struct pm_nl_pernet { @@ -854,14 +855,13 @@ find_next: entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap, MAX_ADDR_ID + 1, pernet->next_id); - if ((!entry->addr.id || entry->addr.id > MAX_ADDR_ID) && - pernet->next_id != 1) { + if (!entry->addr.id && pernet->next_id != 1) { pernet->next_id = 1; goto find_next; } }
- if (!entry->addr.id || entry->addr.id > MAX_ADDR_ID) + if (!entry->addr.id) goto out;
__set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap);