On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 9:51 PM Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
Now, with non-repeatable boot failures, anything is possible, and Sami does mention 6.1.30 as good (implying that 6.1.31 might not be - and that is when the backport happened).
So it's certainly worth checking out, but on the face of it, that bisection result doesn't really support the bug being due to e9523a0d81899 (which came *after* e7b813b32a42).
Sami - awaiting your results.