4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit aa90f9f9554616d5738f7bedb4a8f0e5e14d1bc6 ]
Recently, the subtest numbering was changed to start from 1. While it is fine for displaying results, this should not be the case when the subtests are actually invoked.
Typically, the subtests are stored in zero-indexed arrays and invoked based on the index passed to the main test function. Since the index now starts from 1, the second subtest in the array (index 1) gets invoked instead of the first (index 0). This applies to all of the following subtests but for the last one, the subtest always fails because it does not meet the boundary condition of the subtest index being lesser than the number of subtests.
This can be observed on powerpc64 and x86_64 systems running Fedora 28 as shown below.
Before:
# perf test "builtin clang support" 55: builtin clang support : 55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : Ok 55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : FAILED!
# perf test "LLVM search and compile" 38: LLVM search and compile : 38.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok 38.2: kbuild searching : Ok 38.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok 38.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : FAILED!
# perf test "BPF filter" 40: BPF filter : 40.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok 40.2: BPF pinning : Ok 40.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok 40.4: BPF relocation checker : FAILED!
After:
# perf test "builtin clang support" 55: builtin clang support : 55.1: builtin clang compile C source to IR : Ok 55.2: builtin clang compile C source to ELF object : Ok
# perf test "LLVM search and compile" 38: LLVM search and compile : 38.1: Basic BPF llvm compile : Ok 38.2: kbuild searching : Ok 38.3: Compile source for BPF prologue generation : Ok 38.4: Compile source for BPF relocation : Ok
# perf test "BPF filter" 40: BPF filter : 40.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok 40.2: BPF pinning : Ok 40.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok 40.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das sandipan@linux.ibm.com Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com Cc: Heiko Carstens heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Cc: Hendrik Brueckner brueckner@linux.ibm.com Cc: Jiri Olsa jolsa@redhat.com Cc: Martin Schwidefsky schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: Naveen N. Rao naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Ravi Bangoria ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com Cc: Thomas Richter tmricht@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 9ef0112442bd ("perf test: Fix subtest number when showing results") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180726171733.33208-1-sandipan@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c index 5966f1f9b160..1c9bc3516f8b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int test_and_print(struct test *t, bool force_skip, int subtest) if (!t->subtest.get_nr) pr_debug("%s:", t->desc); else - pr_debug("%s subtest %d:", t->desc, subtest); + pr_debug("%s subtest %d:", t->desc, subtest + 1);
switch (err) { case TEST_OK: @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static int __cmd_test(int argc, const char *argv[], struct intlist *skiplist) for (subi = 0; subi < subn; subi++) { pr_info("%2d.%1d: %-*s:", i, subi + 1, subw, t->subtest.get_desc(subi)); - err = test_and_print(t, skip, subi + 1); + err = test_and_print(t, skip, subi); if (err != TEST_OK && t->subtest.skip_if_fail) skip = true; }