4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 216f0efd19b9cc32207934fd1b87a45f2c4c593e ]
Before this patch, recovery would cause all callbacks to be delayed, put on a queue, and afterward they were all queued to the callback work queue. This patch does the same thing, but occasionally takes a break after 25 of them so it won't swamp the CPU at the expense of other RT processes like corosync.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson rpeterso@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Teigland teigland@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- fs/dlm/ast.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/ast.c b/fs/dlm/ast.c index dcea1e37a1b7..f18619bc2e09 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/ast.c +++ b/fs/dlm/ast.c @@ -290,6 +290,8 @@ void dlm_callback_suspend(struct dlm_ls *ls) flush_workqueue(ls->ls_callback_wq); }
+#define MAX_CB_QUEUE 25 + void dlm_callback_resume(struct dlm_ls *ls) { struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe; @@ -300,15 +302,23 @@ void dlm_callback_resume(struct dlm_ls *ls) if (!ls->ls_callback_wq) return;
+more: mutex_lock(&ls->ls_cb_mutex); list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &ls->ls_cb_delay, lkb_cb_list) { list_del_init(&lkb->lkb_cb_list); queue_work(ls->ls_callback_wq, &lkb->lkb_cb_work); count++; + if (count == MAX_CB_QUEUE) + break; } mutex_unlock(&ls->ls_cb_mutex);
if (count) log_rinfo(ls, "dlm_callback_resume %d", count); + if (count == MAX_CB_QUEUE) { + count = 0; + cond_resched(); + goto more; + } }