On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:00:56PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
When we hot unplug a virtserialport and then try to hot plug again, it fails:
(qemu) chardev-add socket,id=serial0,path=/tmp/serial0,server,nowait (qemu) device_add virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=2,\ chardev=serial0,id=serial0,name=serial0 (qemu) device_del serial0 (qemu) device_add virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=2,\ chardev=serial0,id=serial0,name=serial0 kernel error: virtio-ports vport2p2: Error allocating inbufs qemu error: virtio-serial-bus: Guest failure in adding port 2 for device \ virtio-serial0.0
This happens because buffers for the in_vq are allocated when the port is added but are not released when the port is unplugged.
They are only released when virtconsole is removed (see a7a69ec0d8e4)
To avoid the problem and to be symmetric, we could allocate all the buffers in init_vqs() as they are released in remove_vqs(), but it sounds like a waste of memory.
Rather than that, this patch changes add_port() logic to ignore ENOSPC error in fill_queue(), which means queue has already been filled.
Fixes: a7a69ec0d8e4 ("virtio_console: free buffers after reset") Cc: mst@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier lvivier@redhat.com
Notes: v2: making fill_queue return int and testing return code for -ENOSPC
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 24 +++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c index 7270e7b69262..9e6534fd1aa4 100644 --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c @@ -1325,24 +1325,24 @@ static void set_console_size(struct port *port, u16 rows, u16 cols) port->cons.ws.ws_col = cols; } -static unsigned int fill_queue(struct virtqueue *vq, spinlock_t *lock) +static int fill_queue(struct virtqueue *vq, spinlock_t *lock) { struct port_buffer *buf;
- unsigned int nr_added_bufs;
- int nr_added_bufs; int ret;
nr_added_bufs = 0; do { buf = alloc_buf(vq->vdev, PAGE_SIZE, 0); if (!buf)
break;
return -ENOMEM;spin_lock_irq(lock); ret = add_inbuf(vq, buf); if (ret < 0) { spin_unlock_irq(lock); free_buf(buf, true);
break;
return ret;@@ -1362,7 +1362,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id) char debugfs_name[16]; struct port *port; dev_t devt;
- unsigned int nr_added_bufs; int err;
port = kmalloc(sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -1421,11 +1420,9 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id) spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock); init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
- /* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
- nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
- if (!nr_added_bufs) {
- err = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
- if (err < 0 && err != -ENOSPC) { dev_err(port->dev, "Error allocating inbufs\n");
err = -ENOMEM;
Pls add a comment explaining that -ENOSPC happens when queue already has buffers (e.g. from previous detach).
@@ -2059,14 +2056,11 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) INIT_WORK(&portdev->control_work, &control_work_handler); if (multiport) {
unsigned int nr_added_bufs;- spin_lock_init(&portdev->c_ivq_lock); spin_lock_init(&portdev->c_ovq_lock);
nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq,&portdev->c_ivq_lock);if (!nr_added_bufs) {
err = fill_queue(portdev->c_ivq, &portdev->c_ivq_lock);if (err < 0) { dev_err(&vdev->dev, "Error allocating buffers for control queue\n"); /*@@ -2077,7 +2071,7 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY, 0); /* Device was functional: we need full cleanup. */ virtcons_remove(vdev);
return -ENOMEM;
return err;-- 2.23.0