4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
commit 9390afebe1d3f5a0be18b1afdd0ce09d67cebf9e upstream.
Certain user space programs that run on virtual-8086 mode may utilize instructions protected by the User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security feature present in new Intel processors: SGDT, SIDT and SMSW. In such a case, a general protection fault is issued if UMIP is enabled. When such a fault happens, the kernel traps it and emulates the results of these instructions with dummy values. The purpose of this new test is to verify whether the impacted instructions can be executed without causing such #GP. If no #GP exceptions occur, we expect to exit virtual-8086 mode from INT3.
The instructions protected by UMIP are executed in representative use cases:
a) displacement-only memory addressing b) register-indirect memory addressing c) results stored directly in operands
Unfortunately, it is not possible to check the results against a set of expected values because no emulation will occur in systems that do not have the UMIP feature. Instead, results are printed for verification. A simple verification is done to ensure that results of all tests are identical.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: Andy Lutomirski luto@kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov bp@alien8.de Cc: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Cc: Brian Gerst brgerst@gmail.com Cc: Chen Yucong slaoub@gmail.com Cc: Chris Metcalf cmetcalf@mellanox.com Cc: Dave Hansen dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Cc: Denys Vlasenko dvlasenk@redhat.com Cc: Fenghua Yu fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: H. Peter Anvin hpa@zytor.com Cc: Huang Rui ray.huang@amd.com Cc: Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz Cc: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net Cc: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com Cc: Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu mhiramat@kernel.org Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin mst@redhat.com Cc: Paolo Bonzini pbonzini@redhat.com Cc: Paul Gortmaker paul.gortmaker@windriver.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org Cc: Ravi V. Shankar ravi.v.shankar@intel.com Cc: Shuah Khan shuah@kernel.org Cc: Tony Luck tony.luck@intel.com Cc: Vlastimil Babka vbabka@suse.cz Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-12-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-cal... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c @@ -95,6 +95,22 @@ asm ( "int3\n\t" "vmcode_int80:\n\t" "int $0x80\n\t" + "vmcode_umip:\n\t" + /* addressing via displacements */ + "smsw (2052)\n\t" + "sidt (2054)\n\t" + "sgdt (2060)\n\t" + /* addressing via registers */ + "mov $2066, %bx\n\t" + "smsw (%bx)\n\t" + "mov $2068, %bx\n\t" + "sidt (%bx)\n\t" + "mov $2074, %bx\n\t" + "sgdt (%bx)\n\t" + /* register operands, only for smsw */ + "smsw %ax\n\t" + "mov %ax, (2080)\n\t" + "int3\n\t" ".size vmcode, . - vmcode\n\t" "end_vmcode:\n\t" ".code32\n\t" @@ -103,7 +119,7 @@ asm (
extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[]; extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[], - vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[]; + vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[];
/* Returns false if the test was skipped. */ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip, @@ -160,6 +176,58 @@ static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_stru return true; }
+void do_umip_tests(struct vm86plus_struct *vm86, unsigned char *test_mem) +{ + struct table_desc { + unsigned short limit; + unsigned long base; + } __attribute__((packed)); + + /* Initialize variables with arbitrary values */ + struct table_desc gdt1 = { .base = 0x3c3c3c3c, .limit = 0x9999 }; + struct table_desc gdt2 = { .base = 0x1a1a1a1a, .limit = 0xaeae }; + struct table_desc idt1 = { .base = 0x7b7b7b7b, .limit = 0xf1f1 }; + struct table_desc idt2 = { .base = 0x89898989, .limit = 0x1313 }; + unsigned short msw1 = 0x1414, msw2 = 0x2525, msw3 = 3737; + + /* UMIP -- exit with INT3 unless kernel emulation did not trap #GP */ + do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip - vmcode, VM86_TRAP, 3, "UMIP tests"); + + /* Results from displacement-only addressing */ + msw1 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2052); + memcpy(&idt1, test_mem + 2054, sizeof(idt1)); + memcpy(&gdt1, test_mem + 2060, sizeof(gdt1)); + + /* Results from register-indirect addressing */ + msw2 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2066); + memcpy(&idt2, test_mem + 2068, sizeof(idt2)); + memcpy(&gdt2, test_mem + 2074, sizeof(gdt2)); + + /* Results when using register operands */ + msw3 = *(unsigned short *)(test_mem + 2080); + + printf("[INFO]\tResult from SMSW:[0x%04x]\n", msw1); + printf("[INFO]\tResult from SIDT: limit[0x%04x]base[0x%08lx]\n", + idt1.limit, idt1.base); + printf("[INFO]\tResult from SGDT: limit[0x%04x]base[0x%08lx]\n", + gdt1.limit, gdt1.base); + + if (msw1 != msw2 || msw1 != msw3) + printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SMSW should be the same.\n"); + else + printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SMSW are identical.\n"); + + if (memcmp(&gdt1, &gdt2, sizeof(gdt1))) + printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SGDT should be the same.\n"); + else + printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SGDT are identical.\n"); + + if (memcmp(&idt1, &idt2, sizeof(idt1))) + printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SIDT should be the same.\n"); + else + printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SIDT are identical.\n"); +} + int main(void) { struct vm86plus_struct v86; @@ -218,6 +286,9 @@ int main(void) v86.regs.eax = (unsigned int)-1; do_test(&v86, vmcode_int80 - vmcode, VM86_INTx, 0x80, "int80");
+ /* UMIP -- should exit with INTx 0x80 unless UMIP was not disabled */ + do_umip_tests(&v86, addr); + /* Execute a null pointer */ v86.regs.cs = 0; v86.regs.ss = 0;