From: D. Wythe alibuda@linux.alibaba.com
commit 9f1c50cf39167ff71dc5953a3234f3f6eeb8fcb5 upstream.
There's a potential leak issue under following execution sequence :
smc_release smc_connect_work if (sk->sk_state == SMC_INIT) send_clc_confirim tcp_abort(); ... sk.sk_state = SMC_ACTIVE smc_close_active switch(sk->sk_state) { ... case SMC_ACTIVE: smc_close_final() // then wait peer closed
Unfortunately, tcp_abort() may discard CLC CONFIRM messages that are still in the tcp send buffer, in which case our connection token cannot be delivered to the server side, which means that we cannot get a passive close message at all. Therefore, it is impossible for the to be disconnected at all.
This patch tries a very simple way to avoid this issue, once the state has changed to SMC_ACTIVE after tcp_abort(), we can actively abort the smc connection, considering that the state is SMC_INIT before tcp_abort(), abandoning the complete disconnection process should not cause too much problem.
In fact, this problem may exist as long as the CLC CONFIRM message is not received by the server. Whether a timer should be added after smc_close_final() needs to be discussed in the future. But even so, this patch provides a faster release for connection in above case, it should also be valuable.
Fixes: 39f41f367b08 ("net/smc: common release code for non-accepted sockets") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe alibuda@linux.alibaba.com Acked-by: Karsten Graul kgraul@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *so { struct sock *sk = sock->sk; struct smc_sock *smc; - int rc = 0; + int old_state, rc = 0;
if (!sk) goto out; @@ -188,8 +188,10 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *so sock_hold(sk); /* sock_put below */ smc = smc_sk(sk);
+ old_state = sk->sk_state; + /* cleanup for a dangling non-blocking connect */ - if (smc->connect_nonblock && sk->sk_state == SMC_INIT) + if (smc->connect_nonblock && old_state == SMC_INIT) tcp_abort(smc->clcsock->sk, ECONNABORTED);
if (cancel_work_sync(&smc->connect_work)) @@ -203,6 +205,10 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *so else lock_sock(sk);
+ if (old_state == SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state == SMC_ACTIVE && + !smc->use_fallback) + smc_close_active_abort(smc); + rc = __smc_release(smc);
/* detach socket */