Hi all,
Would it be reasonable to apply commit f2928e224d85 ("riscv: set default pm_power_off to NULL") to 5.10 and 5.15? I see the following issue when testing OpenSUSE's RISC-V configuration in QEMU and it is resolved with that change.
Requesting system poweroff [ 4.497128][ T177] reboot: Power down [ 32.045207][ C0] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [init:177] [ 32.045785][ C0] Modules linked in: [ 32.046166][ C0] CPU: 0 PID: 177 Comm: init Not tainted 5.15.60-default #1 5b276f06901b1c37142db73337a1816290810c90 [ 32.046814][ C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 32.047256][ C0] epc : default_power_off+0x1a/0x20 [ 32.047667][ C0] ra : machine_power_off+0x22/0x2a [ 32.047979][ C0] epc : ffffffff80004a4a ra : ffffffff80004abe sp : ffffffd000bc3d50 [ 32.048405][ C0] gp : ffffffff81bec160 tp : ffffffe002080000 t0 : ffffffff80490964 [ 32.048827][ C0] t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 50203a746f6f6265 s0 : ffffffd000bc3d60 [ 32.049245][ C0] s1 : 000000004321fedc a0 : 0000000000000004 a1 : ffffffff81b073c8 [ 32.049676][ C0] a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : 00000000000000ab a4 : e0b1d187e51c7400 [ 32.050115][ C0] a5 : ffffffff80004a30 a6 : c0000000ffffdfff a7 : ffffffff804ea464 [ 32.050555][ C0] s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : ffffffff81a20390 s4 : fffffffffee1dead [ 32.051009][ C0] s5 : ffffffff81bee0c8 s6 : 0000003feff55a70 s7 : 0000002acc09bf08 [ 32.051427][ C0] s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000002b0a4db6e0 [ 32.051849][ C0] s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : ffffffe001e2bf00 t4 : ffffffe001e2bf00 [ 32.052274][ C0] t5 : ffffffe001e2b000 t6 : ffffffd000bc3ac8 [ 32.052604][ C0] status: 0000000000000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 8000000000000005 qemu-system-riscv64: terminating on signal 15 from pid 2356237 (timeout)
I am not sure if there is any regression potential with that change, hence this email. That change applies cleanly to both trees and I don't see any additional problems from it.
Cheers, Nathan