5.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chengchang Tang tangchengchang@huawei.com
[ Upstream commit 4125269bb9b22e1d8cdf4412c81be8074dbc61ca ]
Use complete parentheses to ensure that macro expansion does not produce unexpected results.
Fixes: a25d13cbe816 ("RDMA/hns: Add the interfaces to support multi hop addressing for the contexts in hip08") Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang tangchengchang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Junxian Huang huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412091616.370789-10-huangjunxian6@hisilicon.c... Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky leon@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h index b7617786b1005..5b2162a2b8cef 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hem.h @@ -60,16 +60,16 @@ enum { (sizeof(struct scatterlist) + sizeof(void *)))
#define check_whether_bt_num_3(type, hop_num) \ - (type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 2) + ((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 2)
#define check_whether_bt_num_2(type, hop_num) \ - ((type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 1) || \ - (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 2)) + (((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 1) || \ + ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 2))
#define check_whether_bt_num_1(type, hop_num) \ - ((type < HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0) || \ - (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == 1) || \ - (type >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && hop_num == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0)) + (((type) < HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0) || \ + ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == 1) || \ + ((type) >= HEM_TYPE_MTT && (hop_num) == HNS_ROCE_HOP_NUM_0))
struct hns_roce_hem_chunk { struct list_head list;