On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 3:30 PM Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org wrote:
From: Saravana Kannan saravanak@google.com
[ Upstream commit 74ffe43bad3af3e2a786ca017c205555ba87ebad ]
fwnode needs to be set for a device for fw_devlink to be able to track/enforce its dependencies correctly. Without this, you'll see error messages like this when the supplier has probed and tries to make sure all its fwnode consumers are linked to it using device links:
tegra-xusb-padctl 3520000.padctl: Failed to create device link (0x180) with 1-0008
Reported-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910130019.35081-1-jonathanh@nvidia.com/ Tested-by: Jon Hunter jonathanh@nvidia.com Suggested-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado nfraprado@collabora.com Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan saravanak@google.com Acked-by: Thierry Reding treding@nvidia.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241024061347.1771063-3-saravanak@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
As mentioned in the original cover letter:
PSA: Do not pull any of these patches into stable kernels. fw_devlink had a lot of changes that landed in the last year. It's hard to ensure cherry-picks have picked up all the dependencies correctly. If any of these really need to get cherry-picked into stable kernels, cc me and wait for my explicit Ack.
Is there a pressing need for this in 4.19?
-Saravana
drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c index dc22b1dd2c8ba..aa050aea2df58 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c +++ b/drivers/phy/tegra/xusb.c @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_port_init(struct tegra_xusb_port *port,
device_initialize(&port->dev); port->dev.type = &tegra_xusb_port_type;
port->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np);
device_set_node(&port->dev, of_fwnode_handle(of_node_get(np))); port->dev.parent = padctl->dev; err = dev_set_name(&port->dev, "%s-%u", name, index);-- 2.43.0