Hi Hamza,
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:39 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
On 10/18/23 14:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 8:24 PM Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com wrote:
With every release of LLVM, both of these sanitizers eat up more and more of the stack. So, set FRAME_WARN to 0 if either of them is enabled for a given build.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz hamza.mahfooz@amd.com
Thanks for your patch!
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -429,11 +429,10 @@ endif # DEBUG_INFO config FRAME_WARN int "Warn for stack frames larger than" range 0 8192
default 0 if KMSAN
default 0 if KASAN || KCSAN || KMSAN
Are kernels with KASAN || KCSAN || KMSAN enabled supposed to be bootable?
They are all intended to be used for runtime debugging, so I'd imagine so.
Then I strongly suggest putting a nonzero value here. As you write that "with every release of LLVM, both of these sanitizers eat up more and more of the stack", don't you want to have at least some canary to detect when "more and more" is guaranteed to run into problems?
Stack overflows do cause crashes.
It is worth noting that FRAME_WARN has been disabled for KMSAN for quite a while and as far as I can tell no one has complained.
ROTFL...
default 2048 if GCC_PLUGIN_LATENT_ENTROPY default 2048 if PARISC default 1536 if (!64BIT && XTENSA)
default 1280 if KASAN && !64BIT default 1024 if !64BIT default 2048 if 64BIT help
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert