[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 07.06.23 19:49, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 05:47:57PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
On 06.06.23 08:45, Greg KH wrote:
Lino, it looks like this regression is caused by (backported) commit of yours. Would you like to take a look on it?
Anyway, telling regzbot:
#regzbot introduced: 51162b05a44cb5
There's some tpm backports to 5.15.y that were suspect and I'll look into reverting them and see if this was one of the ones that was on that list. Give me a few days...
Could you please consider to apply (mainline) commit 0c7e66e5fd69 ("tpm, tpm_tis: Request threaded interrupt handler") to 5.15.y?
As Chris confirmed it fixes the regression caused by 51162b05a44cb5 ("tpm, tpm_tis: Claim locality before writing interrupt registers").
Commit 0c7e66e5fd69 is also needed for 5.10.y, 6.1.y and 6.3.y.
Now queued up, thanks.
#regzbot fix: 0c7e66e5fd69 #regzbot ignore-activity
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.