3.16.54-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Tuomas Tynkkynen tuomas@tuxera.com
commit 8ee031631546cf2f7859cc69593bd60bbdd70b46 upstream.
Commit fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details and inode mode bits.") transformed v9fs_qid_iget() to use iget5_locked() instead of iget_locked(). However, the test() callback is not checking fid.path at all, which means that a lookup in the inode cache can now accidentally locate a completely wrong inode from the same inode hash bucket if the other fields (qid.type and qid.version) match.
Fixes: fd2421f54423 ("fs/9p: When doing inode lookup compare qid details and inode mode bits.") Reviewed-by: Latchesar Ionkov lucho@ionkov.net Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen tuomas@tuxera.com Signed-off-by: Al Viro viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings ben@decadent.org.uk --- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 3 +++ fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -483,6 +483,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode(struct inode
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type) return 0; + + if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path) + return 0; return 1; }
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c @@ -87,6 +87,9 @@ static int v9fs_test_inode_dotl(struct i
if (v9inode->qid.type != st->qid.type) return 0; + + if (v9inode->qid.path != st->qid.path) + return 0; return 1; }