6.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Bo Gan ganboing@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit d7f12857f095ef38523399d47e68787b357232f6 ]
In wrpll_configure_for_rate() we try to determine the best PLL configuration for a target rate. However, in the loop where we try values of R, we should compare the derived `vco` with `target_vco_rate`. However, we were in fact comparing it with `target_rate`, which is actually after Q shift. This is incorrect, and sometimes can result in suboptimal clock rates. Fix it.
Fixes: 7b9487a9a5c4 ("clk: analogbits: add Wide-Range PLL library") Signed-off-by: Bo Gan ganboing@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240830061639.2316-1-ganboing@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd sboyd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c index 65d422a588e1f..9d178afc73bdd 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c +++ b/drivers/clk/analogbits/wrpll-cln28hpc.c @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ int wrpll_configure_for_rate(struct wrpll_cfg *c, u32 target_rate, vco = vco_pre * f; }
- delta = abs(target_rate - vco); + delta = abs(target_vco_rate - vco); if (delta < best_delta) { best_delta = delta; best_r = r;