The patch titled Subject: mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault() has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is mm-userfaultfd-do-not-access-vma-vm_mm-after-calling-handle_userfault.patch
This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-userfaultfd-do-not-access-vma-v... and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-userfaultfd-do-not-access-vma-v...
Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------ From: Gerald Schaefer gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com Subject: mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
Alexander reported a syzkaller / KASAN finding on s390, see below for complete output.
In do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(), the pre-allocated pagetable will be freed in some cases. In the case of userfaultfd_missing(), this will happen after calling handle_userfault(), which might have released the mmap_lock. Therefore, the following pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable) will access an unstable vma->vm_mm, which could have been freed or re-used already.
For all architectures other than s390 this will go w/o any negative impact, because pte_free() simply frees the page and ignores the passed-in mm. The implementation for SPARC32 would also access mm->page_table_lock for pte_free(), but there is no THP support in SPARC32, so the buggy code path will not be used there.
For s390, the mm->context.pgtable_list is being used to maintain the 2K pagetable fragments, and operating on an already freed or even re-used mm could result in various more or less subtle bugs due to list / pagetable corruption.
Fix this by calling pte_free() before handle_userfault(), similar to how it is already done in __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() for the WRITE / non-huge_zero_page case.
Commit 6b251fc96cf2c ("userfaultfd: call handle_userfault() for userfaultfd_missing() faults") actually introduced both, the do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() and also __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page() changes wrt to calling handle_userfault(), but only in the latter case it put the pte_free() before calling handle_userfault().
================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744 Read of size 8 at addr 00000000962d6988 by task syz-executor.0/9334
CPU: 1 PID: 9334 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1-syzkaller-07083-g4c9720875573 #0 Hardware name: IBM 3906 M04 701 (KVM/Linux) Call Trace: [<00000000aa0a7a1c>] unwind_start arch/s390/include/asm/unwind.h:65 [inline] [<00000000aa0a7a1c>] show_stack+0x174/0x220 arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c:135 [<00000000aa105952>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] [<00000000aa105952>] dump_stack+0x262/0x2e8 lib/dump_stack.c:118 [<00000000aa0b484e>] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x5e/0x218 mm/kasan/report.c:385 [<00000000a61f13aa>] __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:545 [inline] [<00000000a61f13aa>] kasan_report+0x11a/0x168 mm/kasan/report.c:562 [<00000000a620d782>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0xcda/0xd90 mm/huge_memory.c:744 [<00000000a610632e>] create_huge_pmd mm/memory.c:4256 [inline] [<00000000a610632e>] __handle_mm_fault+0xe6e/0x1068 mm/memory.c:4480 [<00000000a61067b0>] handle_mm_fault+0x288/0x748 mm/memory.c:4607 [<00000000a598b55c>] do_exception+0x394/0xae0 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:479 [<00000000a598d7c4>] do_dat_exception+0x34/0x80 arch/s390/mm/fault.c:567 [<00000000aa124e5e>] pgm_check_handler+0x1da/0x22c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:706 [<00000000aa0a6902>] copy_from_user_mvcos arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:111 [inline] [<00000000aa0a6902>] raw_copy_from_user+0x3a/0x88 arch/s390/lib/uaccess.c:174 [<00000000a7c24668>] _copy_from_user+0x48/0xa8 lib/usercopy.c:16 [<00000000a5b0b2a8>] copy_from_user include/linux/uaccess.h:192 [inline] [<00000000a5b0b2a8>] __do_sys_sigaltstack kernel/signal.c:4064 [inline] [<00000000a5b0b2a8>] __s390x_sys_sigaltstack+0xc8/0x240 kernel/signal.c:4060 [<00000000aa124a9c>] system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Allocated by task 9334: stack_trace_save+0xbe/0xf0 kernel/stacktrace.c:121 kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:48 kasan_set_track mm/kasan/common.c:56 [inline] __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xd0/0xe8 mm/kasan/common.c:461 slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:526 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2891 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2899 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x118/0x348 mm/slub.c:2904 vm_area_dup+0x9c/0x2b8 kernel/fork.c:356 __split_vma+0xba/0x560 mm/mmap.c:2742 split_vma+0xca/0x108 mm/mmap.c:2800 mlock_fixup+0x4ae/0x600 mm/mlock.c:550 apply_vma_lock_flags+0x2c6/0x398 mm/mlock.c:619 do_mlock+0x1aa/0x718 mm/mlock.c:711 __do_sys_mlock2 mm/mlock.c:738 [inline] __s390x_sys_mlock2+0x86/0xa8 mm/mlock.c:728 system_call+0xe0/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:415
Freed by task 9333: stack_trace_save+0xbe/0xf0 kernel/stacktrace.c:121 kasan_save_stack+0x30/0x60 mm/kasan/common.c:48 kasan_set_track+0x32/0x48 mm/kasan/common.c:56 kasan_set_free_info+0x34/0x50 mm/kasan/generic.c:355 __kasan_slab_free+0x11e/0x190 mm/kasan/common.c:422 slab_free_hook mm/slub.c:1544 [inline] slab_free_freelist_hook mm/slub.c:1577 [inline] slab_free mm/slub.c:3142 [inline] kmem_cache_free+0x7c/0x4b8 mm/slub.c:3158 __vma_adjust+0x7b2/0x2508 mm/mmap.c:960 vma_merge+0x87e/0xce0 mm/mmap.c:1209 userfaultfd_release+0x412/0x6b8 fs/userfaultfd.c:868 __fput+0x22c/0x7a8 fs/file_table.c:281 task_work_run+0x200/0x320 kernel/task_work.c:151 tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:188 [inline] do_notify_resume+0x100/0x148 arch/s390/kernel/signal.c:538 system_call+0xe6/0x28c arch/s390/kernel/entry.S:416
The buggy address belongs to the object at 00000000962d6948 which belongs to the cache vm_area_struct of size 200 The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of 200-byte region [00000000962d6948, 00000000962d6a10) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:00000000313a09fe refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x962d6 flags: 0x3ffff00000000200(slab) raw: 3ffff00000000200 000040000257e080 0000000c0000000c 000000008020ba00 raw: 0000000000000000 000f001e00000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000096959501 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected page->mem_cgroup:0000000096959501
Memory state around the buggy address: 00000000962d6880: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000000962d6900: 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fb fb fb fb fb
00000000962d6980: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
^ 00000000962d6a00: fb fb fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00000000962d6a80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ==================================================================
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110190329.11920-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.c... Fixes: 6b251fc96cf2c ("userfaultfd: call handle_userfault() for userfaultfd_missing() faults") Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com Reported-by: Alexander Egorenkov egorenar@linux.ibm.com Cc: Andrea Arcangeli aarcange@redhat.com Cc: Heiko Carstens hca@linux.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [4.3+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org ---
mm/huge_memory.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c~mm-userfaultfd-do-not-access-vma-vm_mm-after-calling-handle_userfault +++ a/mm/huge_memory.c @@ -710,7 +710,6 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(st transparent_hugepage_use_zero_page()) { pgtable_t pgtable; struct page *zero_page; - bool set; vm_fault_t ret; pgtable = pte_alloc_one(vma->vm_mm); if (unlikely(!pgtable)) @@ -723,25 +722,25 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(st } vmf->ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd); ret = 0; - set = false; if (pmd_none(*vmf->pmd)) { ret = check_stable_address_space(vma->vm_mm); if (ret) { spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); + pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable); } else if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); + pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable); ret = handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_MISSING); VM_BUG_ON(ret & VM_FAULT_FALLBACK); } else { set_huge_zero_page(pgtable, vma->vm_mm, vma, haddr, vmf->pmd, zero_page); spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); - set = true; } - } else + } else { spin_unlock(vmf->ptl); - if (!set) pte_free(vma->vm_mm, pgtable); + } return ret; } gfp = alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask(vma); _
Patches currently in -mm which might be from gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com are
mm-userfaultfd-do-not-access-vma-vm_mm-after-calling-handle_userfault.patch