On 03.10.22 19:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 08:45:18PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 12:07:39PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 30.09.22 14:26, Jerry Ling wrote:
looks like someone has done it: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2059823#p2059823
and the bisect points to:
|# first bad commit: [fc6aff984b1c63d6b9e54f5eff9cc5ac5840bc8c] drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts Best, Jerry |
FWIW, that's 3cf050762534 in mainline. Adding Ville, its author to the list of recipients.
I definitely had no plans to backport any of that stuff, but I guess the automagics did it anyway.
Looks like stable is at least missing this pile of stuff: 50759c13735d drm/i915/pps: Keep VDD enabled during eDP probe 67090801489d drm/i915/pps: Reinit PPS delays after VBT has been fully parsed 8e75e8f573e1 drm/i915/pps: Split PPS init+sanitize in two 586294c3c186 drm/i915/pps: Stash away original BIOS programmed PPS delays 89fcdf430599 drm/i915/pps: Don't apply quirks/etc. to the VBT PPS delays if they haven't been initialized 60b02a09598f drm/i915/pps: Introduce pps_delays_valid()
But dunno if even that is enough.
If you need testers: David (now CCed) apparently has a affected machine and offered to test patches in a different subthread of this thread.
This bug report is probably the same thing: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7013
Sounds like it.
Also cc intel-gfx...
Ahh, sorry, should have done that when I CCed you.
Ciao, Thorsten
Did anyone check if a revert on top of 5.19.12 works easily and solves the problem?
And does anybody known if mainline affected, too?
Ciao, Thorsten
On 9/30/22 07:11, Slade Watkins wrote:
Hey Greg,
On Sep 30, 2022, at 1:59 AM, Greg KH gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 06:37:48AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 10:26:25PM -0400, Jerry Ling wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It has been reported by multiple users across a handful of distros >> that >> there seems to be regression on Framework laptop (which presumably >> is not >> that special in terms of mobo and display) >> >> Ref: >> https://community.frame.work/t/psa-dont-upgrade-to-linux-kernel-5-19-12-arch... > Can anyone do a 'git bisect' to find the offending commit? Also, this works for me on a gen 12 framework laptop: $ uname -a Linux frame 5.19.12 #68 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Sep 30 07:02:33 CEST 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
so there's something odd with the older hardware?
greg k-h
Could be. Running git bisect for 5.19.11 and 5.19.12 (as suggested by the linked forum thread) returned nothing on gen 11 for me.
This is very odd, -srw
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel