On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:15:51AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Tue, 25 Jan 2022 07:48:39 +0900 Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com escreveu:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 19:41:57 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mchehab@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 87d6576ddf8ac25f36597bc93ca17f6628289c16 ]
The name of the package with ctexhook.sty is different on Debian/Ubuntu.
Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab mchehab@kernel.org Tested-by: Akira Yokosawa akiyks@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/63882425609a2820fac78f5e94620abeb7ed5f6f.164142963... Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org
This "Fix" is against upstream commit 7baab965896e ("scripts: sphinx-pre-install: add required ctex dependency") which is also new to v5.17-rc1.
So I don't think this is worth backporting to stable branches.
Well, either both patches should be backported or none, IMHO. I guess I would just backport also commit 7baab965896e.
Ok, in looking at that report, it makes sense, I'll add both of these now.
thanks,
greg k-h