On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
[ Upstream commit 56e337f2cf1326323844927a04e9dbce9a244835 ]
This reverts commit fc328a7d1fcce263db0b046917a66f3aa6e68719.
This commit - while attempting to fix a regression - has caused a number of other problems. As the fallout from it is more significant than the initial problem itself, revert it for now before we find a correct solution.
The patch this reverts is queued as 15/ in the series. Rather than applying broken patch and then reverting, it would be better to drop both, right?
No, this way we don't accidentally add the patch back when the scripts go "hey, you forgot this old commit!"
thanks,
greg k-h