6.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hardevsinh Palaniya hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io
[ Upstream commit 7dd9eb6ba88964b091b89855ce7d2a12405013af ]
The original code checks 'if (ARC_CC_AL)', which is always true since ARC_CC_AL is a constant. This makes the check redundant and likely obscures the intention of verifying whether the jump is conditional.
Updates the code to check cond == ARC_CC_AL instead, reflecting the intent to differentiate conditional from unconditional jumps.
Suggested-by: Vadim Fedorenko vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev Reviewed-by: Vadim Fedorenko vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev Acked-by: Shahab Vahedi list+bpf@vahedi.org Signed-off-by: Hardevsinh Palaniya hardevsinh.palaniya@siliconsignals.io Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta vgupta@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c index 4458e409ca0a..6d989b6d88c6 100644 --- a/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c +++ b/arch/arc/net/bpf_jit_arcv2.c @@ -2916,7 +2916,7 @@ bool check_jmp_32(u32 curr_off, u32 targ_off, u8 cond) addendum = (cond == ARC_CC_AL) ? 0 : INSN_len_normal; disp = get_displacement(curr_off + addendum, targ_off);
- if (ARC_CC_AL) + if (cond == ARC_CC_AL) return is_valid_far_disp(disp); else return is_valid_near_disp(disp);