From: Cong Wang xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
[ Upstream commit 4638faac032756f7eab5524be7be56bee77e426b ]
sock_efree() releases the sock refcnt, if we don't hold this refcnt when setting skb->destructor to it, the refcnt would not be balanced. This leads to several bug reports from syzbot.
I have checked other users of sock_efree(), all of them hold the sock refcnt.
Fixes: c8c8218ec5af ("netrom: fix a memory leak in nr_rx_frame()") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+622bdabb128acc33427d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+6eaef7158b19e3fec3a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+9399c158fcc09b21d0d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+a34e5f3d0300163f0c87@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Cc: Ralf Baechle ralf@linux-mips.org Signed-off-by: Cong Wang xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c +++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c @@ -970,6 +970,7 @@ int nr_rx_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, str
window = skb->data[20];
+ sock_hold(make); skb->sk = make; skb->destructor = sock_efree; make->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;