From: Tiezhu Yang yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
[ Upstream commit ebf7f6f0a6cdcc17a3da52b81e4b3a98c4005028 ]
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance. We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63 ("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is reasonable.
After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can see there exists failed testcase.
On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
On some archs: # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL
Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25 ("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code more readable.
The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh. For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes, it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the JIT.
Here are the test results on x86_64:
# uname -m x86_64 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #142 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang yangtiezhu@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann daniel@iogearbox.net Tested-by: Johan Almbladh johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich iii@linux.ibm.com Acked-by: Björn Töpel bjorn@kernel.org Acked-by: Johan Almbladh johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich iii@linux.ibm.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loon... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 5 +++-- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 5 +++-- arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 3 +-- arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 2 +- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 4 ++-- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 6 ++---- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 7 +++---- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++--- arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c | 2 +- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 10 +++++----- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/core.c | 3 ++- lib/test_bpf.c | 4 ++-- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- 17 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c index eeb6dc0ecf463..e59b41e9ab0c1 100644 --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c @@ -1199,7 +1199,8 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
/* tmp2[0] = array, tmp2[1] = index */
- /* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + /* + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; * tail_call_cnt++; */ @@ -1208,7 +1209,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx) tc = arm_bpf_get_reg64(tcc, tmp, ctx); emit(ARM_CMP_I(tc[0], hi), ctx); _emit(ARM_COND_EQ, ARM_CMP_I(tc[1], lo), ctx); - _emit(ARM_COND_HI, ARM_B(jmp_offset), ctx); + _emit(ARM_COND_CS, ARM_B(jmp_offset), ctx); emit(ARM_ADDS_I(tc[1], tc[1], 1), ctx); emit(ARM_ADC_I(tc[0], tc[0], 0), ctx); arm_bpf_put_reg64(tcc, tmp, ctx); diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 3a8a7140a9bfb..356fb2116c6b2 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -287,13 +287,14 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx) emit(A64_CMP(0, r3, tmp), ctx); emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_CS, jmp_offset), ctx);
- /* if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + /* + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; * tail_call_cnt++; */ emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, ctx); emit(A64_CMP(1, tcc, tmp), ctx); - emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_HI, jmp_offset), ctx); + emit(A64_B_(A64_COND_CS, jmp_offset), ctx); emit(A64_ADD_I(1, tcc, tcc, 1), ctx);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; diff --git a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index bd996ede12f8e..044b11b65bcac 100644 --- a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -1381,8 +1381,7 @@ void build_prologue(struct jit_context *ctx) * 16-byte area in the parent's stack frame. On a tail call, the * calling function jumps into the prologue after these instructions. */ - emit(ctx, ori, MIPS_R_T9, MIPS_R_ZERO, - min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1, 0xffff)); + emit(ctx, ori, MIPS_R_T9, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff)); emit(ctx, sw, MIPS_R_T9, 0, MIPS_R_SP);
/* diff --git a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 815ade7242278..6475828ffb36d 100644 --- a/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/mips/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ void build_prologue(struct jit_context *ctx) * On a tail call, the calling function jumps into the prologue * after this instruction. */ - emit(ctx, addiu, tc, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1, 0xffff)); + emit(ctx, ori, tc, MIPS_R_ZERO, min(MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, 0xffff));
/* === Entry-point for tail calls === */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 0da31d41d4131..8a4faa05f9e41 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(_R0, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); /* tail_call_cnt++; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDIC(_R0, _R0, 1)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out); + PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_RLWINM(_R3, b2p_index, 2, 0, 29)); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 8b5157ccfebae..8571aafcc9e1e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -228,12 +228,12 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], 1, bpf_jit_stack_tailcallcnt(ctx)); EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLWI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)); - PPC_BCC(COND_GT, out); + PPC_BCC(COND_GE, out);
/* * tail_call_cnt++; diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index e6497424cbf60..529a83b85c1c9 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -799,11 +799,10 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) emit_bcc(BPF_JGE, lo(idx_reg), RV_REG_T1, off, ctx);
/* - * temp_tcc = tcc - 1; - * if (tcc < 0) + * if (--tcc < 0) * goto out; */ - emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_T1, RV_REG_TCC, -1), ctx); + emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_TCC, -1), ctx); off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn)); emit_bcc(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
@@ -829,7 +828,6 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) if (is_12b_check(off, insn)) return -1; emit(rv_lw(RV_REG_T0, off, RV_REG_T0), ctx); - emit(rv_addi(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_T1, 0), ctx); /* Epilogue jumps to *(t0 + 4). */ __build_epilogue(true, ctx); return 0; diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index f2a779c7e225d..603630b6f3c5b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -327,12 +327,12 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn)); emit_branch(BPF_JGE, RV_REG_A2, RV_REG_T1, off, ctx);
- /* if (TCC-- < 0) + /* if (--TCC < 0) * goto out; */ - emit_addi(RV_REG_T1, tcc, -1, ctx); + emit_addi(RV_REG_TCC, tcc, -1, ctx); off = ninsns_rvoff(tc_ninsn - (ctx->ninsns - start_insn)); - emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, tcc, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx); + emit_branch(BPF_JSLT, RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_ZERO, off, ctx);
/* prog = array->ptrs[index]; * if (!prog) @@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ static int emit_bpf_tail_call(int insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) if (is_12b_check(off, insn)) return -1; emit_ld(RV_REG_T3, off, RV_REG_T2, ctx); - emit_mv(RV_REG_TCC, RV_REG_T1, ctx); __build_epilogue(true, ctx); return 0; } diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 233cc9bcd6527..9ff2bd83aad70 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, jit->prg);
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt++ > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */
@@ -1381,9 +1381,9 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp, EMIT4_IMM(0xa7080000, REG_W0, 1); /* laal %w1,%w0,off(%r15) */ EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xeb000000, 0x00fa, REG_W1, REG_W0, REG_15, off); - /* clij %w1,MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT,0x2,out */ + /* clij %w1,MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT-1,0x2,out */ patch_2_clij = jit->prg; - EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, + EMIT6_PCREL_RIEC(0xec000000, 0x007f, REG_W1, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT - 1, 2, jit->prg);
/* diff --git a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c index 9a2f20cbd48b7..0bfe1c72a0c9e 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c +++ b/arch/sparc/net/bpf_jit_comp_64.c @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void emit_tail_call(struct jit_ctx *ctx) emit(LD32 | IMMED | RS1(SP) | S13(off) | RD(tmp), ctx); emit_cmpi(tmp, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT, ctx); #define OFFSET2 13 - emit_branch(BGU, ctx->idx, ctx->idx + OFFSET2, ctx); + emit_branch(BGEU, ctx->idx, ctx->idx + OFFSET2, ctx); emit_nop(ctx);
emit_alu_K(ADD, tmp, 1, ctx); diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index bafe36e69227d..b87d98efd2240 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void emit_indirect_jump(u8 **pprog, int reg, u8 *ip) * ... bpf_tail_call(void *ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) ... * if (index >= array->map.max_entries) * goto out; - * if (++tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; * prog = array->ptrs[index]; * if (prog == NULL) @@ -446,14 +446,14 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used, EMIT2(X86_JBE, offset); /* jbe out */
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off] */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
offset = ctx->tail_call_indirect_label - (prog + 2 - start); - EMIT2(X86_JA, offset); /* ja out */ + EMIT2(X86_JAE, offset); /* jae out */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */ EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off], eax */
@@ -504,14 +504,14 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_direct(struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke, int offset;
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ EMIT2_off32(0x8B, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off] */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xF8, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT); /* cmp eax, MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT */
offset = ctx->tail_call_direct_label - (prog + 2 - start); - EMIT2(X86_JA, offset); /* ja out */ + EMIT2(X86_JAE, offset); /* jae out */ EMIT3(0x83, 0xC0, 0x01); /* add eax, 1 */ EMIT2_off32(0x89, 0x85, tcc_off); /* mov dword ptr [rbp - tcc_off], eax */
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index da9b7cfa46329..429a89c5468b5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip) EMIT2(IA32_JBE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2));
/* - * if (tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) + * if (tail_call_cnt++ >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT) * goto out; */ lo = (u32)MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT; @@ -1337,7 +1337,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip) /* cmp ecx,lo */ EMIT3(0x83, add_1reg(0xF8, IA32_ECX), lo);
- /* ja out */ + /* jae out */ EMIT2(IA32_JAE, jmp_label(jmp_label1, 2));
/* add eax,0x1 */ diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 755f38e893be1..9f20b0f539f78 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ struct bpf_array { };
#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 1000000 /* yes. 1M insns */ -#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 32 +#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 33
#define BPF_F_ACCESS_MASK (BPF_F_RDONLY | \ BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG | \ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index ba5af15e25f5c..b12cfceddb6e9 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ union bpf_attr { * if the maximum number of tail calls has been reached for this * chain of programs. This limit is defined in the kernel by the * macro **MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT** (not accessible to user space), - * which is currently set to 32. + * which is currently set to 33. * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. * diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 2405e39d800fe..b52dc845ecea3 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1574,7 +1574,8 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries)) goto out; - if (unlikely(tail_call_cnt > MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)) + + if (unlikely(tail_call_cnt >= MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT)) goto out;
tail_call_cnt++; diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index adae39567264f..0c5cb2d6436a4 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -14683,7 +14683,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, - .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, + .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, }, { "Tail call count preserved across function calls", @@ -14705,7 +14705,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { }, .stack_depth = 8, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, - .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, + .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, }, { "Tail call error path, NULL target", diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index ba5af15e25f5c..b12cfceddb6e9 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ union bpf_attr { * if the maximum number of tail calls has been reached for this * chain of programs. This limit is defined in the kernel by the * macro **MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT** (not accessible to user space), - * which is currently set to 32. + * which is currently set to 33. * Return * 0 on success, or a negative error in case of failure. *