On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:54:09AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
This reverts commit 1815d9c86e3090477fbde066ff314a7e9721ee0f.
Unfortunately this inverts the locking hierarchy, so back to the drawing board. Full lockdep splat below:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Not tainted
kms_frontbuffer/1087 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810dcd01a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x22e/0xca0 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x42/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&client->modeset_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x1c/0x180 drm_client_modeset_commit+0x1c/0x40 __drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x88/0xb0 drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x40 intel_fbdev_set_par+0x11/0x40 [i915] fbcon_init+0x270/0x4f0 visual_init+0xc6/0x130 do_bind_con_driver+0x1e5/0x2d0 do_take_over_console+0x10e/0x180 do_fbcon_takeover+0x53/0xb0 register_framebuffer+0x22d/0x310 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36c/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0 drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->master_mutex --> &client->modeset_mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&client->modeset_mutex); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&dev->master_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kms_frontbuffer/1087: #0: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 1087 Comm: kms_frontbuffer Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3234.A01.1906141750 06/14/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7f/0xad check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0 drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
daniel@phenom:~/linux/drm-misc-fixes$ dim fixes 1815d9c86e3090477fbde066ff314a7e9721ee0f Fixes: 1815d9c86e30 ("drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master") Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Cc: Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com Cc: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org Cc: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Cc: David Airlie airlied@linux.ie Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch
You have your "dim fixes" command line in the commit message.
This goes through Intel's CI shortly, if it agrees with this then
Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries Acked-by: Petri Latvala petri.latvala@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 51 ++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c index 86d4b72e95cb..232abbba3686 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c @@ -61,35 +61,6 @@
- trusted clients.
*/ -static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv) -{
- lockdep_assert_held_once(&fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex);
- return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master;
-}
-/**
- drm_is_current_master - checks whether @priv is the current master
- @fpriv: DRM file private
- Checks whether @fpriv is current master on its device. This decides whether a
- client is allowed to run DRM_MASTER IOCTLs.
- Most of the modern IOCTL which require DRM_MASTER are for kernel modesetting
- the current master is assumed to own the non-shareable display hardware.
- */
-bool drm_is_current_master(struct drm_file *fpriv) -{
- bool ret;
- mutex_lock(&fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex);
- ret = drm_is_current_master_locked(fpriv);
- mutex_unlock(&fpriv->master->dev->master_mutex);
- return ret;
-} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_is_current_master);
int drm_getmagic(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv) { struct drm_auth *auth = data; @@ -252,7 +223,7 @@ int drm_setmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, if (ret) goto out_unlock;
- if (drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv))
- if (drm_is_current_master(file_priv)) goto out_unlock;
if (dev->master) { @@ -301,7 +272,7 @@ int drm_dropmaster_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, if (ret) goto out_unlock;
- if (!drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv)) {
- if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out_unlock; }
@@ -350,7 +321,7 @@ void drm_master_release(struct drm_file *file_priv) if (file_priv->magic) idr_remove(&file_priv->master->magic_map, file_priv->magic);
- if (!drm_is_current_master_locked(file_priv))
- if (!drm_is_current_master(file_priv)) goto out;
drm_legacy_lock_master_cleanup(dev, master); @@ -371,6 +342,22 @@ void drm_master_release(struct drm_file *file_priv) mutex_unlock(&dev->master_mutex); } +/**
- drm_is_current_master - checks whether @priv is the current master
- @fpriv: DRM file private
- Checks whether @fpriv is current master on its device. This decides whether a
- client is allowed to run DRM_MASTER IOCTLs.
- Most of the modern IOCTL which require DRM_MASTER are for kernel modesetting
- the current master is assumed to own the non-shareable display hardware.
- */
+bool drm_is_current_master(struct drm_file *fpriv) +{
- return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_is_current_master);
/**
- drm_master_get - reference a master pointer
- @master: &struct drm_master
-- 2.32.0.rc2