On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:22 AM Kammela, Gayatri gayatri.kammela@intel.com wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 10:25 AM To: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael@kernel.org Cc: Kammela, Gayatri gayatri.kammela@intel.com; Zhang, Rui rui.zhang@intel.com; Linux PM linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; Platform Driver platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Len Brown lenb@kernel.org; Darren Hart dvhart@infradead.org; Alex Hung alex.hung@canonical.com; Daniel Lezcano daniel.lezcano@linaro.org; Amit Kucheria amit.kucheria@verdurent.com; Westerberg, Mika mika.westerberg@intel.com; Peter Zijlstra peterz@infradead.org; Prestopine, Charles D charles.d.prestopine@intel.com; 5 . 6+ stable@vger.kernel.org; Pandruvada, Srinivas srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com; Wysocki, Rafael J rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI: fix: Update Tiger Lake ACPI device IDs
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:34 PM Gayatri Kammela gayatri.kammela@intel.com wrote:
{"INT1044"},{"INT1047"},
{"INTC1040"},{"INTC1043"},{"INTC1044"},{"INTC1047"}, {"INT3400"}, {"INT3401", INT3401_DEVICE}, {"INT3402"},--
I can take this along with the other two patches in the series if that is fine by Andy and Rui.
One nit is to fix the ordering to be alphanumeric or close enough (I admit in some cases it might require unneeded churn) to that.
Thanks Andy and Rafael! Should I send v3 for this series with right ordering this time?
No need, I can fix up the ordering just fine.
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Thanks!