From: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
[ Upstream commit 1c500ad706383f1a6609e63d0b5d1723fd84dab9 ]
syzbot is reporting circular locking problem at __loop_clr_fd() [1], for commit a160c6159d4a0cf8 ("block: add an optional probe callback to major_names") is calling the module's probe function with major_names_lock held.
Fortunately, since commit 990e78116d38059c ("block: loop: fix deadlock between open and remove") stopped holding loop_ctl_mutex in lo_open(), current role of loop_ctl_mutex is to serialize access to loop_index_idr and loop_add()/loop_remove(); in other words, management of id for IDR. To avoid holding loop_ctl_mutex during whole add/remove operation, use a bool flag to indicate whether the loop device is ready for use.
loop_unregister_transfer() which is called from cleanup_cryptoloop() currently has possibility of use-after-free problem due to lack of serialization between kfree() from loop_remove() from loop_control_remove() and mutex_lock() from unregister_transfer_cb(). But since lo->lo_encryption should be already NULL when this function is called due to module unload, and commit 222013f9ac30b9ce ("cryptoloop: add a deprecation warning") indicates that we will remove this function shortly, this patch updates this function to emit warning instead of checking lo->lo_encryption.
Holding loop_ctl_mutex in loop_exit() is pointless, for all users must close /dev/loop-control and /dev/loop$num (in order to drop module's refcount to 0) before loop_exit() starts, and nobody can open /dev/loop-control or /dev/loop$num afterwards.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=7bb10e8b62f83e4d445cdf4c13d69e407e62955... [1] Reported-by: syzbot syzbot+f61766d5763f9e7a118f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/adb1e792-fc0e-ee81-7ea0-0906fc36419d@i-love.sakura... Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/block/loop.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- drivers/block/loop.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index f0cdff0c5fbf..1f91bd41a29b 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -2113,18 +2113,6 @@ int loop_register_transfer(struct loop_func_table *funcs) return 0; }
-static int unregister_transfer_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data) -{ - struct loop_device *lo = ptr; - struct loop_func_table *xfer = data; - - mutex_lock(&lo->lo_mutex); - if (lo->lo_encryption == xfer) - loop_release_xfer(lo); - mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex); - return 0; -} - int loop_unregister_transfer(int number) { unsigned int n = number; @@ -2132,9 +2120,20 @@ int loop_unregister_transfer(int number)
if (n == 0 || n >= MAX_LO_CRYPT || (xfer = xfer_funcs[n]) == NULL) return -EINVAL; + /* + * This function is called from only cleanup_cryptoloop(). + * Given that each loop device that has a transfer enabled holds a + * reference to the module implementing it we should never get here + * with a transfer that is set (unless forced module unloading is + * requested). Thus, check module's refcount and warn if this is + * not a clean unloading. + */ +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD + if (xfer->owner && module_refcount(xfer->owner) != -1) + pr_err("Danger! Unregistering an in use transfer function.\n"); +#endif
xfer_funcs[n] = NULL; - idr_for_each(&loop_index_idr, &unregister_transfer_cb, xfer); return 0; }
@@ -2325,8 +2324,9 @@ static int loop_add(int i) } else { err = idr_alloc(&loop_index_idr, lo, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL); } + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (err < 0) - goto out_unlock; + goto out_free_dev; i = err;
err = -ENOMEM; @@ -2392,15 +2392,19 @@ static int loop_add(int i) disk->private_data = lo; disk->queue = lo->lo_queue; sprintf(disk->disk_name, "loop%d", i); + /* Make this loop device reachable from pathname. */ add_disk(disk); + /* Show this loop device. */ + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + lo->idr_visible = true; mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return i;
out_cleanup_tags: blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set); out_free_idr: + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, i); -out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); out_free_dev: kfree(lo); @@ -2410,9 +2414,14 @@ out:
static void loop_remove(struct loop_device *lo) { + /* Make this loop device unreachable from pathname. */ del_gendisk(lo->lo_disk); blk_cleanup_disk(lo->lo_disk); blk_mq_free_tag_set(&lo->tag_set); + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number); + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + /* There is no route which can find this loop device. */ mutex_destroy(&lo->lo_mutex); kfree(lo); } @@ -2436,31 +2445,40 @@ static int loop_control_remove(int idx) return -EINVAL; } + /* Hide this loop device for serialization. */ ret = mutex_lock_killable(&loop_ctl_mutex); if (ret) return ret; - lo = idr_find(&loop_index_idr, idx); - if (!lo) { + if (!lo || !lo->idr_visible) ret = -ENODEV; - goto out_unlock_ctrl; - } + else + lo->idr_visible = false; + mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + if (ret) + return ret;
+ /* Check whether this loop device can be removed. */ ret = mutex_lock_killable(&lo->lo_mutex); if (ret) - goto out_unlock_ctrl; + goto mark_visible; if (lo->lo_state != Lo_unbound || atomic_read(&lo->lo_refcnt) > 0) { mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex); ret = -EBUSY; - goto out_unlock_ctrl; + goto mark_visible; } + /* Mark this loop device no longer open()-able. */ lo->lo_state = Lo_deleting; mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_mutex);
- idr_remove(&loop_index_idr, lo->lo_number); loop_remove(lo); -out_unlock_ctrl: + return 0; + +mark_visible: + /* Show this loop device again. */ + mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + lo->idr_visible = true; mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); return ret; } @@ -2474,7 +2492,8 @@ static int loop_control_get_free(int idx) if (ret) return ret; idr_for_each_entry(&loop_index_idr, lo, id) { - if (lo->lo_state == Lo_unbound) + /* Hitting a race results in creating a new loop device which is harmless. */ + if (lo->idr_visible && data_race(lo->lo_state) == Lo_unbound) goto found; } mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex); @@ -2590,10 +2609,14 @@ static void __exit loop_exit(void) unregister_blkdev(LOOP_MAJOR, "loop"); misc_deregister(&loop_misc);
- mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex); + /* + * There is no need to use loop_ctl_mutex here, for nobody else can + * access loop_index_idr when this module is unloading (unless forced + * module unloading is requested). If this is not a clean unloading, + * we have no means to avoid kernel crash. + */ idr_for_each_entry(&loop_index_idr, lo, id) loop_remove(lo); - mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
idr_destroy(&loop_index_idr); } diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.h b/drivers/block/loop.h index 1988899db63a..04c88dd6eabd 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.h +++ b/drivers/block/loop.h @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct loop_device { struct blk_mq_tag_set tag_set; struct gendisk *lo_disk; struct mutex lo_mutex; + bool idr_visible; };
struct loop_cmd {