From: Paulo Alcantara pc@manguebit.com
commit d99e86ebde2d7b3a04190f8d14de5bf6814bf10f upstream.
The client was sending rfc1002 session request packet with a wrong length field set, therefore failing to mount shares against old SMB servers over port 139.
Fix this by calculating the correct length as specified in rfc1002.
Fixes: d7173623bf0b ("cifs: use ALIGN() and round_up() macros") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) pc@manguebit.com Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg lsahlber@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Steve French stfrench@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- fs/cifs/connect.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c @@ -2843,72 +2843,48 @@ ip_rfc1001_connect(struct TCP_Server_Inf * negprot - BB check reconnection in case where second * sessinit is sent but no second negprot */ - struct rfc1002_session_packet *ses_init_buf; - unsigned int req_noscope_len; - struct smb_hdr *smb_buf; - - ses_init_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rfc1002_session_packet), - GFP_KERNEL); - - if (ses_init_buf) { - ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.called_len = 32; - - if (server->server_RFC1001_name[0] != 0) - rfc1002mangle(ses_init_buf->trailer. - session_req.called_name, - server->server_RFC1001_name, - RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); - else - rfc1002mangle(ses_init_buf->trailer. - session_req.called_name, - DEFAULT_CIFS_CALLED_NAME, - RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); - - ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.calling_len = 32; - - /* - * calling name ends in null (byte 16) from old smb - * convention. - */ - if (server->workstation_RFC1001_name[0] != 0) - rfc1002mangle(ses_init_buf->trailer. - session_req.calling_name, - server->workstation_RFC1001_name, - RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); - else - rfc1002mangle(ses_init_buf->trailer. - session_req.calling_name, - "LINUX_CIFS_CLNT", - RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); - - ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.scope1 = 0; - ses_init_buf->trailer.session_req.scope2 = 0; - smb_buf = (struct smb_hdr *)ses_init_buf; - - /* sizeof RFC1002_SESSION_REQUEST with no scopes */ - req_noscope_len = sizeof(struct rfc1002_session_packet) - 2; - - /* == cpu_to_be32(0x81000044) */ - smb_buf->smb_buf_length = - cpu_to_be32((RFC1002_SESSION_REQUEST << 24) | req_noscope_len); - rc = smb_send(server, smb_buf, 0x44); - kfree(ses_init_buf); - /* - * RFC1001 layer in at least one server - * requires very short break before negprot - * presumably because not expecting negprot - * to follow so fast. This is a simple - * solution that works without - * complicating the code and causes no - * significant slowing down on mount - * for everyone else - */ - usleep_range(1000, 2000); - } + struct rfc1002_session_packet req = {}; + struct smb_hdr *smb_buf = (struct smb_hdr *)&req; + unsigned int len; + + req.trailer.session_req.called_len = sizeof(req.trailer.session_req.called_name); + + if (server->server_RFC1001_name[0] != 0) + rfc1002mangle(req.trailer.session_req.called_name, + server->server_RFC1001_name, + RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); + else + rfc1002mangle(req.trailer.session_req.called_name, + DEFAULT_CIFS_CALLED_NAME, + RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); + + req.trailer.session_req.calling_len = sizeof(req.trailer.session_req.calling_name); + + /* calling name ends in null (byte 16) from old smb convention */ + if (server->workstation_RFC1001_name[0] != 0) + rfc1002mangle(req.trailer.session_req.calling_name, + server->workstation_RFC1001_name, + RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); + else + rfc1002mangle(req.trailer.session_req.calling_name, + "LINUX_CIFS_CLNT", + RFC1001_NAME_LEN_WITH_NULL); + + /* + * As per rfc1002, @len must be the number of bytes that follows the + * length field of a rfc1002 session request payload. + */ + len = sizeof(req) - offsetof(struct rfc1002_session_packet, trailer.session_req); + + smb_buf->smb_buf_length = cpu_to_be32((RFC1002_SESSION_REQUEST << 24) | len); + rc = smb_send(server, smb_buf, len); /* - * else the negprot may still work without this - * even though malloc failed + * RFC1001 layer in at least one server requires very short break before + * negprot presumably because not expecting negprot to follow so fast. + * This is a simple solution that works without complicating the code + * and causes no significant slowing down on mount for everyone else */ + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
return rc; }