The patch below does not apply to the 4.20-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to stable@vger.kernel.org.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b0407d820b65272fcaa77e0dd1347dc7678d23b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" gustavo@embeddedor.com Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 12:34:31 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: (occ) Fix potential integer overflow
Cast get_unaligned_be32(...) to u64 in order to give the compiler complete information about the proper arithmetic to use and avoid a potential integer overflow.
Notice that such function call is used in contexts that expect expressions of type u64 (64 bits, unsigned); and the following expressions are currently being evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic:
val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * occ->powr_sample_time_us;
val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * occ->powr_sample_time_us;
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442357 ("Unintentional integer overflow") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442476 ("Unintentional integer overflow") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1442508 ("Unintentional integer overflow") Fixes: ff692d80b2e2 ("hwmon (occ): Add sensor types and versions") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com Reviewed-by: Eddie James eajames@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck linux@roeck-us.net
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c index 423903f87955..391118c8aae8 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c @@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_1(struct device *dev, val *= 1000000ULL; break; case 2: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 3: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL; @@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_2(struct device *dev, &power->update_tag); break; case 2: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 3: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->value) * 1000000ULL; @@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, &power->system.update_tag); break; case 2: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->system.update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 3: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->system.value) * 1000000ULL; @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, &power->proc.update_tag); break; case 6: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->proc.update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 7: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->proc.value) * 1000000ULL; @@ -491,8 +491,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, &power->vdd.update_tag); break; case 10: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdd.update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 11: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdd.value) * 1000000ULL; @@ -505,8 +505,8 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_power_a0(struct device *dev, &power->vdn.update_tag); break; case 14: - val = get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * - occ->powr_sample_time_us; + val = (u64)get_unaligned_be32(&power->vdn.update_tag) * + occ->powr_sample_time_us; break; case 15: val = get_unaligned_be16(&power->vdn.value) * 1000000ULL;