On 7/4/19 2:10 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:08 PM Wolfram Sang wsa@the-dreams.de wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 01:37:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
gcc-9 complains about a blatant uninitialized variable use that all earlier compiler versions missed:
drivers/iio/adc/rcar-gyroadc.c:510:5: warning: 'ret' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Return -EINVAL instead here.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 059c53b32329 ("iio: adc: Add Renesas GyroADC driver") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
This is correct but missing that the above 'return ret' is broken, too. ret is initialized but 0 in that case.
Nice catch! Oh well, given enough eyeballs, ...
I don't think ret is initialized, reg is, not ret .
And maybe we can use something else than -EINVAL for this case? I am on the go right now, I will look for a suggestion later.
-EINVAL is correct here (and in the above case, too), IMHO.
Yep, -EINVAL is fine.