4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com
[ Upstream commit ecc443c03fb14abfb8a6af5e3b2d43b5257e60f2 ]
pn533_recv_response() is an urb completion handler, so it must use GFP_ATOMIC. pn533_usb_send_frame() OTOH runs from a regular sleeping context, so the pn533_submit_urb_for_response() there (and only there) can use the regular GFP_KERNEL flags.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514134 Fixes: 9815c7cf22da ("NFC: pn533: Separate physical layer from ...") Cc: Michael Thalmeier michael.thalmeier@hale.at Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@microsoft.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void pn533_recv_response(struct u struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
if (!urb->status) { - skb = alloc_skb(urb->actual_length, GFP_KERNEL); + skb = alloc_skb(urb->actual_length, GFP_ATOMIC); if (!skb) { nfc_err(&phy->udev->dev, "failed to alloc memory\n"); } else { @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int pn533_usb_send_frame(struct p
if (dev->protocol_type == PN533_PROTO_REQ_RESP) { /* request for response for sent packet directly */ - rc = pn533_submit_urb_for_response(phy, GFP_ATOMIC); + rc = pn533_submit_urb_for_response(phy, GFP_KERNEL); if (rc) goto error; } else if (dev->protocol_type == PN533_PROTO_REQ_ACK_RESP) {