5.15-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: John Stultz jstultz@google.com
commit ed366de8ec89d4f960d66c85fc37d9de22f7bf6d upstream.
Building with clang results in the following warning:
posix_timers.c:69:6: warning: absolute value function 'abs' given an argument of type 'long long' but has parameter of type 'int' which may cause truncation of value [-Wabsolute-value] if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) { ^ So switch to using llabs() instead.
Fixes: 0bc4b0cf1570 ("selftests: add basic posix timers selftests") Signed-off-by: John Stultz jstultz@google.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410232637.4135564-3-jstultz@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int check_diff(struct timeval sta diff = end.tv_usec - start.tv_usec; diff += (end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec) * USECS_PER_SEC;
- if (abs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) { + if (llabs(diff - DELAY * USECS_PER_SEC) > USECS_PER_SEC / 2) { printf("Diff too high: %lld..", diff); return -1; }