From: Hui Li caelli@tencent.com
[ Upstream commit 4903fde8047a28299d1fc79c1a0dcc255e928f12 ]
It is possible to hang pty devices in this case, the reader was blocking at epoll on master side, the writer was sleeping at wait_woken inside n_tty_write on slave side, and the write buffer on tty_port was full, we found that the reader and writer would never be woken again and blocked forever.
The problem was caused by a race between reader and kworker: n_tty_read(reader): n_tty_receive_buf_common(kworker): copy_from_read_buf()| |room = N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - (ldata->read_head - tail) |room <= 0 n_tty_kick_worker() | |ldata->no_room = true
After writing to slave device, writer wakes up kworker to flush data on tty_port to reader, and the kworker finds that reader has no room to store data so room <= 0 is met. At this moment, reader consumes all the data on reader buffer and calls n_tty_kick_worker to check ldata->no_room which is false and reader quits reading. Then kworker sets ldata->no_room=true and quits too.
If write buffer is not full, writer will wake kworker to flush data again after following writes, but if write buffer is full and writer goes to sleep, kworker will never be woken again and tty device is blocked.
This problem can be solved with a check for read buffer size inside n_tty_receive_buf_common, if read buffer is empty and ldata->no_room is true, a call to n_tty_kick_worker is necessary to keep flushing data to reader.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 42458f41d08f ("n_tty: Ensure reader restarts worker for next reader") Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Hui Li caelli@tencent.com Message-ID: 1680749090-14106-1-git-send-email-caelli@tencent.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c index 8f57448e1ce46..6259249b11670 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c @@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ static void n_tty_kick_worker(struct tty_struct *tty) struct n_tty_data *ldata = tty->disc_data;
/* Did the input worker stop? Restart it */ - if (unlikely(ldata->no_room)) { - ldata->no_room = 0; + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(ldata->no_room))) { + WRITE_ONCE(ldata->no_room, 0);
WARN_RATELIMIT(tty->port->itty == NULL, "scheduling with invalid itty\n"); @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ n_tty_receive_buf_common(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *cp, if (overflow && room < 0) ldata->read_head--; room = overflow; - ldata->no_room = flow && !room; + WRITE_ONCE(ldata->no_room, flow && !room); } else overflow = 0;
@@ -1692,6 +1692,17 @@ n_tty_receive_buf_common(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *cp, } else n_tty_check_throttle(tty);
+ if (unlikely(ldata->no_room)) { + /* + * Barrier here is to ensure to read the latest read_tail in + * chars_in_buffer() and to make sure that read_tail is not loaded + * before ldata->no_room is set. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (!chars_in_buffer(tty)) + n_tty_kick_worker(tty); + } + up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
return rcvd; @@ -2252,8 +2263,14 @@ static ssize_t n_tty_read(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file, if (time) timeout = time; } - if (old_tail != ldata->read_tail) + if (old_tail != ldata->read_tail) { + /* + * Make sure no_room is not read in n_tty_kick_worker() + * before setting ldata->read_tail in copy_from_read_buf(). + */ + smp_mb(); n_tty_kick_worker(tty); + } up_read(&tty->termios_rwsem);
remove_wait_queue(&tty->read_wait, &wait);