16 Apr
2018
16 Apr
'18
4:12 p.m.
On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:02:03 +0000 Sasha Levin Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com wrote:
One of the things Greg is pushing strongly for is "bug compatibility": we want the kernel to behave the same way between mainline and stable. If the code is broken, it should be broken in the same way.
Wait! What does that mean? What's the purpose of stable if it is as broken as mainline?
-- Steve