6.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Coly Li colyli@kernel.org
[ Upstream commit 7e76336e14de9a2b67af96012ddd46c5676cf340 ]
In _badblocks_check(), there are lines of code like this, 1246 sectors -= len; [snipped] 1251 WARN_ON(sectors < 0);
The WARN_ON() at line 1257 doesn't make sense because sectors is unsigned long long type and never to be <0.
Fix it by checking directly checking whether sectors is less than len.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Coly Li colyli@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai yukuai3@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250309160556.42854-1-colyli@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe axboe@kernel.dk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- block/badblocks.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c index dc147c0179612..23acdf7c6f363 100644 --- a/block/badblocks.c +++ b/block/badblocks.c @@ -1246,14 +1246,15 @@ static int _badblocks_check(struct badblocks *bb, sector_t s, sector_t sectors, len = sectors;
update_sectors: + /* This situation should never happen */ + WARN_ON(sectors < len); + s += len; sectors -= len;
if (sectors > 0) goto re_check;
- WARN_ON(sectors < 0); - if (unacked_badblocks > 0) rv = -1; else if (acked_badblocks > 0)