6.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
[ Upstream commit 5d010473cdeaabf6a2d3a9e2aed2186c1b73c213 ]
Calling fwnode_get_next_child_node() in ACPI implementation of the fwnode property API is somewhat problematic as the latter is used in the impelementation of the former. Instead of using fwnode_get_next_child_node() in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(), call acpi_get_next_subnode() directly instead.
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron jonathan.cameron@huawei.com Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251001104320.1272752-3-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.c... Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index b12057baaae7b..19737f9e1e16f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -1472,7 +1472,7 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
if (!prev) { do { - port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port); + port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port); /* * The names of the port nodes begin with "port@" * followed by the number of the port node and they also @@ -1490,13 +1490,13 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint( if (!port) return NULL;
- endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, prev); + endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev); while (!endpoint) { - port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port); + port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port); if (!port) break; if (is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port")) - endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, NULL); + endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, NULL); }
/*