4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Russell King rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk
[ Upstream commit acf1c02f023926b8b04672a9e81b1711ae681619 ]
The options word is a be16 quantity, so we need to test the flags having converted the endian-ness. Convert the flag bits to be16, which can be optimised by the compiler, rather than converting a variable at runtime.
Reported-by: Florian Fainelli f.fainelli@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Russell King rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: David S. Miller davem@davemloft.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org --- drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c +++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_link_check_los(struct * SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL are set? For now, we assume * the same as SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL set. */ - if (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) + if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED)) los ^= SFP_F_LOS;
if (los) @@ -583,7 +583,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_event(struct sfp *sfp if (event == SFP_E_TX_FAULT) sfp_sm_fault(sfp, true); else if (event == - (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED ? + (sfp->id.ext.options & + cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) ? SFP_E_LOS_HIGH : SFP_E_LOS_LOW)) sfp_sm_link_up(sfp); break; @@ -593,7 +594,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_event(struct sfp *sfp sfp_sm_link_down(sfp); sfp_sm_fault(sfp, true); } else if (event == - (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED ? + (sfp->id.ext.options & + cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) ? SFP_E_LOS_LOW : SFP_E_LOS_HIGH)) { sfp_sm_link_down(sfp); sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_WAIT_LOS, 0);