4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric W. Biederman ebiederm@xmission.com
commit a36700589b85443e28170be59fa11c8a104130a5 upstream.
While fixing an out of bounds array access in known_siginfo_layout reported by the kernel test robot it became apparent that the same bug exists in siginfo_layout and affects copy_siginfo_from_user32.
The straight forward fix that makes guards against making this mistake in the future and should keep the code size small is to just take an unsigned signal number instead of a signed signal number, as I did to fix known_siginfo_layout.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" ebiederm@xmission.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
--- include/linux/signal.h | 2 +- kernel/signal.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/signal.h +++ b/include/linux/signal.h @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ enum siginfo_layout { #endif };
-enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(int sig, int si_code); +enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(unsigned sig, int si_code);
/* * Define some primitives to manipulate sigset_t. --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -2700,7 +2700,7 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE2(rt_sigpending, co } #endif
-enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(int sig, int si_code) +enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(unsigned sig, int si_code) { enum siginfo_layout layout = SIL_KILL; if ((si_code > SI_USER) && (si_code < SI_KERNEL)) {