Artem,
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2018, 16:01:15 CET schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:43 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
As stated by David Woodhouse, it was a huge mistake by UBI to not reject MLC NAND from the very beginning.
Correction: when we were developing UBI/UBIFS and upstreamed them, MLC was widely used yet we did not really know about it. So there was nothing to reject yet.
You mean *not* widely used?
The mistake is that we did not add the reject timely. When people started reporting MLC issues we were answering that UBI/UBIFS stack needs more work to make MLC safe to use, and we hoped someone would do the work.
True. TBH Boris and I also thought that adding MLC support is not a that big deal...
Thanks, //richard